Spider-Man: No Way Home

Spider-Man: No Way Home

Peter Parker is unmasked and no longer able to separate his normal life from the high-stakes of being a super-hero. When he asks for help from Doctor Strange the stakes become even more dangerous, forcing him to discover what it truly means to be Spider-Man.

  • Released: 2021-12-15
  • Runtime: 148 minutes
  • Genre: Action, Adventure
  • Stars: Tom Holland, Zendaya, Benedict Cumberbatch, Jon Favreau, Jacob Batalon, Marisa Tomei, Alfred Molina, Jamie Foxx, Willem Dafoe, Tony Revolori, Angourie Rice, Martin Starr, Hannibal Buress, J.B. Smoove, J.K. Simmons, Benedict Wong, Paula Newsome, Harry Holland, Arian Moayed, Jay Karales, Thomas Haden Church, Rhys Ifans, Jorge Lendeborg Jr., Thomas Haden Church, Rhys Ifans, Tobey Maguire, Rhys Ifans, Thomas Haden Church, Rhys Ifans, Michael Le, Andrew Garfield, Tobey Maguire, Rhys Ifans, Thomas Haden Church, Charlie Cox, Tom Hardy, Haroon Kahn, Emily Lue-Fong, Rudy Eisenzopf, Ben VanderMey, Gary Weeks, Gregory Konow, Tom Hardy, Jay Karales, Cristo Fernández, Jake Gyllenhaal, Mary Rivera, Kathleen Cardoso, Jonathan Sam, Andrew Dunlap, Zany Dunlap, B. Clutch Dunlap, Minnah Dunlap, Carol Anne Dines, Anisa Nyell Johnson, Willie Burton, Mallory Hoff, Greg Clarkson, Regina Ting Chen, Robert Mitchel Owenby, Glenn Keogh, Paris Benjamin, Jwaundace Candece, Taylor St. Clair, Gabriella Cila, Darnell Appling, Rolando Fernandez, Edward Force, Michael Le, Dean Meminger, Frederick A. Brown, Clay Savage, Jay Karales, Jake Gyllenhaal, Luke Aitchison, Tarek al Halabi, McDaniel Austin, Gloria Bishop, Stephen Branson, Kyle Bryde, Tommy Campbell, Riley Cliett, Jay Karales, Emily Fong, Jay Karales, John Barnes, Nicholas Hammond, Gina Aponte
  • Director: Jon Watts
 Comments
  • edie_22032024 - 7 June 2024
    Untitled
    Its probably so far, the only one among all MCU films I saw or watched, that moved me to tears by last a few shot on scene. I can't believe that I finally become one of the people to eat out of MCU filmmaker's hand. Wait, its just one.

    Fun to watch since the moment triptych of spider men all come up to scene in this film.

    What moved me most is the ending.

    When you wear a suit or anything not you were born with, you get a chance either you like or hate, they grow on you, they go autopilot after iteration. When we wear an accent, or a behaviour, a social status, an occupation, an emotion, whatever it is, we accord with the role that we all could even in a detached way to observe them. In some cases, it's easier to undress, others, not that fortunately, erase all the memories? Even for the part you hate or being dismayed, to totally send them off from your head. Um, I for one, will be in a terrible tingling panic. That's why sometimes I tell myself, its uncomfortable or inconvenient, its also what whetted your mind, waying out of haywire.

    I brace that involuntary sadness, then I don't feel inept to cope.
  • joshgggg - 15 April 2024
    With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility (Part 3)
    I am shocked this got such a high rating. I bought into the hype of this movie, but I should have known better after Endgame. Maybe I would have liked it more if it was the first movie in the trilogy, but at this point it's just lazily done nostalgia bait.

    Peter Parker in his first appearance proclaimed he already knew that he has a massive responsibility to protect innocents. Yet, here we are after everything we have gone though with Peter retreading the same ground we have already went over numerous times. Did Peter not even listen to Tony Stark when he was ripping him a new one in Homecoming about his reckless behavior? Did Peter really not learn his lesson not to trust villains after the events of Far From Home? Did Peter really need to get his hot aunt killed for this lesson to finally sink in?

    Unfortunately even the lesson is done wrong in this movie. May's death didn't enforce her point that he must take responsible for his actions or they'll lead to negative consequences. The lesson was that he was doing the right thing all along by giving the villains second chances, and must stay the course regardless of her death. So while the villains from different universes kill Peter's aunt and could potentially be killing off hundreds of other innocent people due to Peter's reckless actions. At least the three Peter's have conveniently united and are slowly but surly coming up with magical cures for the sociopaths.

    There are positives in this film, but none of those have anything to do with Tom Holland's Spiderman, so I won't bother.
  • mrluxinatux - 10 March 2024
    Enjoyable for what it is
    This movie is the straight up definition of a fan film. Not that that's bad, but the whole plot of every Spider-Man villain in the past movies somehow finding its way into one is kinda ridiculous, but I'll give it this. It's entertaining. Never been the biggest Holland fan, but he gives his best performance here, and of course Willem DaFoe is phenomenal. The action is pretty consistent and there aren't too many draggy spots. Easily the best scene is in the condo, when Peter realizes Norman isn't all what he seems to be. The "that's some neat trick" line was a pretty good spot to flip the movie. The Statue of Liberty scene is good too, and goblin sneaking a bomb into the time stone was a pretty cool shot. Overall pretty decent movie that I didn't take too seriously but enjoyed nonetheless.
  • ptp1315 - 25 December 2022
    Almost unwatchable
    Besides Tobey Maguire Andrew Garfield and the characters from the first two Spider-Man series are the only thing that saved this movie from being an absolute zero It was very poorly written which would be a zero the acting outside of those was a zero besides Aunt May I would have really liked to watch this movie without the new Spider-Man and his crew they were horrendously bad this could have been a great film. Outside of the two real Spider-Man's there's no saving value of this movie I would definitely not recommend go to YouTube and watch the scenes with the real Spider-Man's and that's more than enough.
  • jimmycondon - 17 November 2022
    Best Spider-Man film yet!
    This is definitely the best spider man film yet! Sure, maybe the beginning was rushed but once they got to the multiverse stuff it was amazing! It was dark at times and it was also funny at times. Tobey and Andrew deserve sequels to their franchises but we'll probably see them again in like Secret Wars or something. Aunt May's death was heartbreaking and was the true shocking moment in the film. In my opinion, Willem Dafoe's Green Goblin was better in this film then he was in Spider Man (2002). I mean cmon, Tom Holland tried to kill him for gosh shake. I remember when people were saying like "oh this movie will suck cause of too much fan service" but they were able to add that and add a good story and plot at the same time so that is the really impressive. If it wasn't for Marvel Studios though this movie would be trash! Not only do I think it's the best Spider Man movie but it's also the best movie in Phase 4. If you like Marvel and Spider Man watch this movie like right now on Starz or whatever.
  • TobiasDShade - 25 October 2022
    TONS OF POTENTIAL
    I wonder how much better the story with Kraven the hunter could have been?

    I just dont think they needed to force this spiderman reunion when marvel had plenty of other things it could have put into motion as fan service. It warped so many storylines and possibilities to fit itself and thats where i felt dissapointed, this really could have been done later. I do admit the cameos were really fun but thats pretty much the only thing this movie had.

    Spiderman and most super hero movies are notorious for recycling their mainstream villains and thats really a disservice to the characters personal growth.
  • name99-92-545389 - 29 September 2022
    Yes! And No...
    This movie tries to be ambitious along two very diferent dimensions. And succeeds wildly on the one, fails wildly on on the other.

    OK, so the obvious dimension is that playing with and tying together the five previous Spiderman movies (with even a hint of Into the Spiderverse and Miles Morales). This was done astonishingly well, and it's unsurprising that the fans loved and continue to love it. Nothing more needs to be said on this score.

    The less obvious dimension is the on-going attempt by the younger generation to redefine morality by pretending that hard choices simply don't exist, that every moral dilemma is solvable just by wishing it to be so. This is not morality, this is cowardice. And so we have in this movie the happy idea that we can reform the villains. Yes, this is a beautiful dream; but it relies on magic. It is not applicable to the real world.

    Am I being silly here? I don't think so. If there's anything we should have learned from the past 300 years or so, it's that public morality (ie the morality of public spaces, the stories that get the most publicity) becomes the morality of a civilization.

    The morality of virtus became the morality of Christianity (for better or worse, as in Genealogy of Morals). What we now have replacing Christianity is something that pretends to be, and claims to be, deeper and richer, but is in fact grounded in the individual never having to feel bad. In this new morality there are two primary commandments
    • you're allowed to do whatever you want (as long as you know the correct words to justify it...) Be lazy, become a junkie, abandon your kids, leave your husband; they're all fine just so long as you present them in the right way. (Find a movie in which your situation happens, and study its lingo.)
    • you should never have to make an uncomfortable choice. If magic is not available to solve your particular moral dilemma, find someone to blame for this magic not being available and shift the moral burden onto them.


    Those of us who have been around long enough thought that we'd hit some sort of end point of morality with the 70s or 80s. Sure, a public acceptance of a certain degree of grossness, but ultimately still grounded in people understanding personal responsibility and the nature of choices. I don't think any of us expected things to wriggle out so wildly from that ground understanding to this new world where choices should not have to exist, and if they do, it's someone else's fault. Fukuyama was too early - we have not reached the end of history, because this morality is something truly new, and it seems unlikely to me that it is capable of sustaining civilization. (And on the way, I suspect it will result in atrocity unlike anything ever seen before. Nothing is as heartless as someone infuriated that *you* are the cause of their moral qualms...)